Blogger’s Take: Earnings, Revenue & Guidance

This is the third edition of our new feature: Blogger’s Take. This week, at about the halfway point through quarterly reporting, we have a go at Earnings, Revenue and Guidance.

Good upside surprises, weak upside guidance: According to Birinyi Associates, the current quarter has so far matched last quarter with the second highest “beat rate” since the bull market began – so far, 72% of S&P 500 companies have beaten estimates. On the opposite side, only ten percent have missed estimates, which is the lowest quarterly figure of the bull market. Upside guidance this earnings season has not been as positive. Just six percent of companies have guided higher, which is the lowest level seen since the first quarter of 2003.

And while we have had some enormous success stories, we all have seeen quite a few blow ups. I would characterize this quarter as "Very strong, but with some significant dissappointments."

What does our blogging crew think? Let’s have a look:

Are we having a good earnings season, a bad one or something in between? We can all name some of each. I think a bull or a bear could spin this go around to make their argument.

Instead of trying cherry pick certain reports to fit my opinion I think it makes sense to look at how the market is reacting. The market is working higher, maybe grinding higher is a better description but either way I don’t think the net result, so far, after factoring in the good, the bad and the ugly is an obstacle for the market. Quite the opposite actually, blowups notwithstanding, as the market has defied the skeptics, me included.

My net conclusion is that I still think the market will correct and when/if it does earnings will play no part in a turning point. There are many obstacles, indicators and supposed truisms that say the market “has” to correct and I think it will be these things, things Barry for one has written about, that carry more weight than earnings.

Roger Nusbaum, Random Roger

~~~

I’m siding with the Bears on this one.  The Bulls are pointing to a few pockets of great earnings as evidence of a larger trend that doesn’t exist.  Google’s earnings are about as good an indicator of the state of the economy as Peyton Manning’s completion percentage is to who wins the World Series.  Pockets of good and bad always exist, regardless of overall economic trends, but pundits tend to see what they want to see in the news.  I expect many more earnings disappointments over the next year.

-Rob May, Business Pundit

~~~

Even though third-quarter earnings season has been welcomed by Dow 12,000, some interesting trends have emerged thus far.

While we are less than two weeks into earnings season (Alcoa’s report on 10/10 marked the start), 125 S&P 500 companies have reported.  Using quarterly comparisons, the current quarter has so far matched last quarter with the second highest beat rate since the bull market began — 72% of S&P 500 companies have beaten estimates.  On the opposite side, just ten percent have missed estimates, which is the lowest quarterly figure of the bull market.

Upside guidance this earnings season has not been as positive.  Just six percent of companies have guided higher, which is the lowest level seen since the first quarter of 2003.

Analyzing the one-day price impact from earnings reports, companies that have beaten estimates have gone up an average of just 26 bps while companies that have missed have averaged a loss of 5.4%.  We realize that as earnings season continues, the averages should become more inline with prior quarters, but the current figures show that misses are being punished while beats are not being rewarded.

On a sector basis, energy, tech and health care have had the highest beat rates while consumer staples, industrials and materials are missing estimates the most.

Justin Walters, Ticker Sense

~~~~

From 1960 to the present, the S&P 500 Index stocks have paid out an average of 50% of their earnings as dividends. The low point for this proportion was 2000-2001, when dividends dropped to 29% of earnings. The present time period is the second lowest since 1960, as we now stand at 33%. The drop in the market from 2000 to 2002 corresponded to a period in which dividends went from 29% up to almost 65% of earnings.  In other words, the dividend:earnings ratio reverted to its long-term mean by earnings taking more of a tumble than dividends.  Indeed, dividends remained relatively stable from 2000-2002; it was earnings that took the hit.

While we don’t know the exact timing of any future reversion to this historical mean, we do know it can only happen in one of two ways: by dividends rising much faster than earnings or by earnings falling much faster than dividends.  S&P earnings have risen sharply since 2003, from $27.59 to the current $74.49.  During this period, dividends have not kept pace with the earnings rise: we’ve actually seen a decline in the dividend:earnings ratio.  If companies aren’t going to increase the proportion of earnings they pay out as dividends when times are this good, it’s hard to know what will make them raise the allocation.

Which leaves us only falling earnings to return us to historical norms.

-Brett N. Steenbarger, Ph.D. Traderfeed

~~~

Category: Blog Spotlight

Two-horned bull?

Category: Investing, Markets, Technical Analysis

Record Short Interest Prevents Correction

Category: Markets, Psychology, Technical Analysis, Trading

Blog Spotlight: Global Economic Analysis

Another edition of our new series:  Blog Spotlight.

We put together a short list of excellent but somewhat overlooked
blog that deserves a greater audience. Expect to see a post from a
different featured blogger here every Tuesday and Thursday evening,
around 7pm.

Up next in our Blogger Spotlight:  Michael Shedlock and Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis. Mike is one of the editors of The Survival Report, covering stocks and the economy. He also writes for the Daily Reckoning, and co-edits Whiskey & Gunpowder. He also runs stock boards on the Motley Fool, Silicon Investor, and TheMarketTraders. He is an avid photographer, when not writing about stocks or the economy, with over 80 magazine and book covers to his credit.

>

 

Mish_geta

>

Earnings,  Confidence, and Boxes

Countrywide
reported
third-quarter profit rose 2
percent, less than analysts expected, as demand for home loans slumped. The
company’s shares surged higher on plans to lay off more than 2,500 employees
and buy back up to $2.5 billion of stock, and as higher profits in other units,
including Countrywide Bank, cushioned the mortgage decline.

It seems the street just can’t get enough bad news. CFC
rallied 5% as investors warmly welcomed news of more layoffs. CFC is already
talking about the 2008
recovery
. It’s never too early to do that. “By 2008, surviving players will be positioned for ‘one hell of a year’”
said CEO Angelo Mozilo.

Ford lost $5.8 billion, or $3.08 per share, during the 3rd
quarter this year. Sales fell 10% to $36.7 billion. Excluding special charges,
Ford posted a loss from continuing operations of $1.2 billion or 62 cents per
share. Last year during the same period, Ford posted a net loss of $284
million, or 15 cents per share. Ford has now lost $7.2 billion for the year. 3Q
output was down 11% vs. 17% drop in overall North American sales and a 25% drop
in F-series pickups. The company plans
4Q North American output cuts of 21%.

Ford called those results “clearly
unacceptable”
. Shares of Ford are also up since the announcement. Yes those
results are “unacceptable” but what is Ford doing about it? Ford’s “Way
Forward” plan, calls for eliminating 44,000 hourly and salaried jobs, closing 16 factories and making other
changes by 2012. Part of the “Way Forward” is to Kill Taurus and
along with it a lot of jobs at US assembly plants.

Read More

Category: Blog Spotlight

The Return of CNBC.com

Category: Financial Press, Web/Tech

How Good Are Earnings Really?

Category: Earnings, Economy

IBM Suing Amazon over Patents

Category: Corporate Management, Intellectual Property, Technology, Web/Tech

Log in problem fix

Category: RR&A

Why 2006 won’t be like 1995

Category: Economy, Federal Reserve, Inflation

The Linkfests never stop!

Category: Weblogs