Yet another good list from Swing Trader Alan Farley:
Farley notes the truism that "the market is a tough place to earn a living. The majority of profits go to a minority of traders. Members of this elite group utilize a definable trading edge at all times. In essence, this advantage is a point of view, scheme or plan of attack that separates them from the crowd."
That statement, as obvious as it is, seems to difficult for many people to empotionally grasp. Markets are a zero sum game; You are either a) one of the outperforming traders, or 2) The guy thats paying them.
Farley lists "10 tasks you need to accomplish to find your trading edge. Not sure if you have a definable trading edge? If you have to ask, you don’t have one.
Here’s the 10:
1. Build on your own observations. Catalogue the moves that catch your attention and deconstruct them. How did they begin, and how did they interact with the chart patterns? Have you seen this type of move before? What kept you out of the trade the last time it happened? Small discoveries are the key to building a sustainable trading edge.
2. Walk the path alone. It doesn’t matter what other traders think, believe or act upon. Avoid the chat rooms and stock boards at all costs. Start figuring things out for yourself.
3. Keep it simple. Many traders look for a trading edge through complex mechanical systems. But it makes more sense to stick with the basics so you understand exactly why the last trade worked or failed. Over time, this self-analysis will evolve into unique rules, filters and tactics that match your trading style and skills.
4. Take personal responsibility. You have a big problem if you’re blaming Alan Greenspan, bad software and market makers for your continued failure. Accept the playing field as it stands, then figure out how to prosper from it.
5. Play the "what if" game. Scan the environment looking for clues to anything that might compromise your positions. You can avoid the majority of disasters by taking the first warning signs and moving back to the sidelines.
6. Prepare for change. Traders who think they have an edge may have none at all, or one that won’t stand the test of time.
7. Choose technology wisely. Adequate tools foster a minor edge over those less prepared for the market day. Technology won’t turn a bad trader into a good one.
[But lousy tech will lose good traders money -BLR].
8. Be an aggressive manager. Your full-time efforts must be devoted to increasing your profits on good trades and reducing your losses on bad ones.
9. Use both sides of your brain. A definable edge requires a mental process that feels like intuition. Profitability grows when we act spontaneously after internalizing prior trading experiences.
10. Think globally; act locally. Entry and exit rules define profitability better than any other technique. Those who focus ruthlessly on the tape are more interested in making money than being right.
10 Ways to Find Your Trading Edge
RealMoney.com, 2/17/2005 12:00 PM EST
Here’s something enormously gratifying: A front page WSJ article about why Radio sucks.
The reporter even got the cause & effect right. Satellite and iPod’s successes came about because Radio was so bad. Even my whipping boy, The 1996 Telecommunications Reform Act, catches blame. You can also see the impact of the Wired article (mentioned here earlier in the month) on the overall flavor of the piece.
While I place a lot more emphasis on the actual reasons for the migration away from radio, this piece is very much in the Big Picture spirit. As someone who has been kvetching about this for years, I am very pleased to see this front page WSJ coverage.
One thing I note as missing is a discussion of the long term generational effect, and the threat to a possible radio recovery: Since 1996, radio’s decay has led to an entire generation of listeners who have essentially written off radio (at least, when it comes to music).
The other key issue: Radio as a source of new music, and its relationship to the labels. (Not really discussed). It used to be part of the draw — a relationship with a trusted DJ who plays music you like, combined with introducing you to new songs (trust is the key component in granting someone taste-maker status).
I do not see how merely imitating the iPod’s shuffle feature will do the trick. Walk along the beach this summer — there are hardly any radios blaring — a peaceful
easy feeling eerie quiet, and lots of white headphone cords.
We discussed the The Hamburger Helper Effect previously. What will undo a complete shift of media consumption habits of an entire generation of listeners? Can the broadcast industry recapture these lost ears? (I dunno). If they can, then what will they have to so in order to bring back their lost audience?
1) Is it
even possible; b) how they might accomplish that trick?
I’m not sure that anything short of a massive unwinding of radio concentration, and a return to local managers, program directors, DJs and playlists will undo the damage. Even then, you have to win back the listeners who felt betrayed and abandoned.
The 1996 Telecommunications Reform Act provides us with yet another example of the law of unintended consequences . . .
Hit by iPod and Satellite, Radio Tries New Tune: Play More Songs
After Mergers, Bland Sound Left Giants Vulnerable; Fewer Ads, Added Variety Engineering a ‘Train Wreck’
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, March 18, 2005; Page A1