Several people have specifically asked for my explicit investing thesis, as opposed to the more general economic discussion/market analysis we see on the blog.
It is a fine line to provide stimulating discussion here, while at the same time not being unfair to the people who actually pay for our research and commentary. Anytime research runs in the press (Such as this "Real Estate and the Post-Crash Economy") some subscriber lodges a complaint.
An astute observer should be able to deduce what my general views are from the various posts and appearances. I do not think any of the paying subscribers will be offended if I pull an introductory quote that reveals some additional details from a much longer piece.
This is the intro from yesterday’s market commentary:
"In a seeming paradox, we have a rapidly accelerating market, and a rapidly decelerating economy. Hopes for a rate cut in the face of this asset inflation are pushed out further and further into the future. This is now a trading market, where momentum and trend dominate, increasingly detached from the decaying domestic fundamentals. Global growth remains strong, and despite that – or perhaps because of it – US markets are lagging their overseas peers (see table of global bourses on page 5).
How much further this market can rally is anyone’s guess, but a “Melt-Up” to Dow 14,000 would not surprise us. While overdue for a pullback (see #1 below), the markets have shown little interest in any such activity. Instead, traders seem to want to rally ‘em on any news, good or bad.
A melt up would likely be accompanied by rush back into equities by the one group notably absent from the current action: the public. As the trading volumes at the major online brokers have revealed, John Q. Public is nowhere to be found in the current market. We suspect that the aforementioned rush back in would be accompanied by a significant spike in Bullish sentiment. Until that excessive Bullish sentiment develops, it is not safe to trade on the short side of the market.
Meanwhile, a “melt up” presents a high risk trading, not investing, opportunity. A melt up inflates the air pocket that has already developed underneath the present environment; only the most nimble traders are capable of avoiding the ensuing danger."
Today’s WSJ had an interesting quote describing Wednesday’s action as a Buying Panic, a characterization I do not disagree with:
"For the next week or two, I would advise investors
who have money that they’re thinking of putting in the market to hold
off," said strategist Al Goldman, of A.G. Edwards & Sons. Mr.
Goldman said there seems to be a "buying panic" this week among money
managers who have come to regret keeping clients’ money on the
sidelines during last month’s gains. "At the end of the day, these guys
are paid to manage stock, not to manage cash," he said."
That oughta hold the little bastards . . .
Next stop, Dow 14,000?
RR&A, May 2, 2007
‘Buying Panic’ Drives Stocks As Blue-Chip Rally Goes On
PETER A. MCKAY
WSJ, May 3, 2007; Page C1
Yet another talented UK vocalist taking her cues from the past, but with a modern twist: Amy Winehouse. Winehouse’s 2nd album, Back to Black, freshens up the classic soul albums with original songs done in the style of the 1950/60′s girl groups.
New Yorker Magazine got it just right — “a fierce English performer whose voice combines the smoky depths of a jazz chanteuse with the heated passion of a soul singer.” I hate when people compare a new performer with the greats, but you can say that stylistically, she falls between Billie Holiday and Ronnie Spector.
This is the fourth musician we’ve spotlighted, who have gone retro — delving into an older genre and freshening it up (Bitter:Sweet, James Hunter and Joss Stone were the first three). Except for Bitter:Sweet, they all seem to hail from England.
There’s a good interview here and 4 videos of acoustic versions of her songs after the jump (I cannot link to AOL’s DL as its a terribly annoying site)