Here’s a "Man Bites Dog" type story for you:
"Coldplay’s new CD comes with an insert that discloses all the rules enforced by the DRM they included on the disc. Of course, these rules are only visible after you’ve paid for the CD and brought it home, and as the disc’s rules say, "Except for manufacturing problems, we do not accept product exchange, return or refund," so if you don’t like the rules, that’s tough.
What are the other rules? Here are some gems: "This CD can’t be burnt onto a CD or hard disc, nor can it be converted to an MP3" and "This CD may not play in DVD players, car stereos, portable players, game players, all PCs and Macintosh PCs." Best of all, the insert explains that this is all "in order for you to enjoy a high quality music experience." Now, that’s quality."
Its a perfect example of how a small omission on the internet can spiral into a series of larger errors.
Amazingly, the mainstream press did not — to its credit – get the significant details incorrect.
I had been given X&Y — I ripped it to MP3s (and AACs), and played it in a DVD and a Car stereo — so I knew at least the US version was not DRM protected.
Indeed, as the itch post stated:
"Virgin Records deserves a spanking. I’ll do what I want with the content I pay for, thank you very much. When will they realize that if it’s in bits and bytes, nothing’s ever secure?
Un. Fucking. Believable. This is India, Virgin. INDIA. Piracy started here, dammit. You can’t play Nazi with India." (emphasis added)
Not only did boingboing miss the India connection, but they also overstated the restrictions. Its not that you are not allowed to play the CD in car stereos or DVD players; Rather, the DRM crippled CD might not work in those devices.
Further, have a close look at the leaflet –
click for larger photo
I sent this info to Cory, and after the long New Year’s weekend, he posted a correction, with even more details, at boingboing at 10:19:22 PM on January 5, 2006.
"A knowledgeable source has identified this as a Macrovision DRM and disclaimer, and noted that the label only bought licenses to sell this CD with that DRM in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region.
However, the original report originates in India, which suggests that the CDs are either being exported out of the region, or that the label is issuing the discs without a license for their DRM.
But that was after the vlog Rocketboom picked up the week old tale — and the details became even more muddied.
Rocketboom’s lovely Amanda Congdon — was that you on Lexington Avenue & 44rd the week of December 21st? — repeated boingboing’s overstatement. Again, its not that you are not allowed to play the CD in car stereos or DVD players; Rather, the DRM crippled CD might not work in those devices.
If you want ot be upset over this DRM issue, than my suggestion is to criticize the misleading labelling of the CD as a Compact disc — when it is in fact not. That’s the larger, legal issue not being discussed: Where are the trademark holders (Philips and Sony?) in this? They need to step up to the plate and defend their IP.
Indeed, as this snapshot shows, the packaging not only claims that it is a compact disc, but is compatible with all these other players, as well as Mac OS:
here’s the ironic part: The NYT’s What’s Online, to its credit, gets the details correct:
"ANTI-PIRACY FOLLIES Sometimes, real life is just too funny to be parodied. This week Boingboing.net takes a look at a new CD by the band Coldplay. Inside, some music fans outside the United States and Britain will find a hilariously long list of "rules" that are enforced by EMI’s antipiracy software. Among them are no converting songs into MP3 format and no ripping and storing songs on a hard drive or CD. "Some" CD players, car stereos, DVD players and PC’s will not play the CD. It cannot be played on a Mac. EMI, with no apparent irony, tells CD buyers that the rules are enforced "in order for you to enjoy high quality music."
I suspect that after the MSM screwed up the Bush National Guard forgery last year, the Press might have become increasingly conscious of fact checking. (That’s just a guess on my part).
Kudos to the NYT for getting one right, and to boingboing for their correction.
One minor nit to pick in the NYT’s piece: X&Y is not a new CD — it came out on June 7, 2005; It would have been more accurate to state it was Coldplay’s "latest release" than a new CD . . .
A Blog That Blogs Corporate Blogs:
By DAN MITCHELL
Published: January 7, 2006
ColdPlay CD DRM — more information
boing boing, Thursday, January 5, 2006 t 10:19:22 PM http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/05/coldplay_cd_drm_more.html
coldplay’s new music CD has usage rules
amanda congdonRocketboom, thursday january 05, 2006 http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives/2006/01/rb_06_jan_05.html
Coldplay’s new CD has rules: No MP3s, no DVD players, no car stereos
boing boing, Friday, December 30, 2005 11:05:35 AM
Bad, bad Coldplay
Back on December 1, I mentioned that "Holiday sales increases can be in the 3 to 4% range." This modestly Bullish call was at the very low end of Wall Street projections.
The prime motivation for that range was the decreasing gasoline prices post Katrina, and the love affair with Plasma Screen TVs (that was the good news). Keeping the Bullishness modest was the negative real income for the middle class; on the other end, the increasing take home pay for the ultra wealthy supported the relative strength of the luxury retailer.
The WSJ reports that "overall, Retail Sales rose 3.2%." And, the big winners were the luxury stores. Its a pleasant surprise anytime projections like this end up that accurate.
I also wish to remind you (again) how the silly NRF projection of 22% was; Their absurdity was a statistical abomination (and they were chastised in this space for it)
Here’s the Journal’s summary:
Holiday shoppers spent big on a few products last month, but held out for last-minute deals, resulting in mixed performances from U.S. retailers. Cash registers rang at luxury retailers and teen specialty shops, but sales at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. disappointed.
Overall, sales at stores open at least a year, a measure known as same-store sales, rose 3.2% in December from a year earlier, according to an index of 66 chains compiled by the International Council of Shopping Centers. The trade group, based in New York, had expected same-stores sales growth between 3% and 3.5%. According to the tally, same-store sales at luxury stores grew 6.4%, while discounters ticked up just 2.6%.
"All combined it was good, not great," said Jeff Klinefelter, senior research analyst at Piper Jaffray. "When we finally got the last-minute rush, it was the higher-end consumer that followed through with spending."
Luxury Stores Were Holidays’ Stars
Overall Retail Sales Rose 3.2%, Slowed by Discounters; Holdout Shoppers Also Hurt
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL,January 6, 2006; Page A2
Mixed Stockings for Retailers
See the WSJ’s retailer chart here: