Read it here first: Rebates Suck

I’ve long railed against the rip off (2003) that is mail-in consumer rebates. I applauded Best Buy’s decision to drop them, and Marketwatch’s coverage of related rebate problems.

My own consumer experience with rebates has been decidely negative, that I refuse to buy any product with a rebate. Period, end of story, no further discussion necessary. And going by your Feedback on the subject, so has yours.

The NYT discusses this today in "A Growing Anger Over Unpaid Rebates." They quote Matthew Gold, a staff lawyer with Federal Trade Commission, who notes "Fraud is not involved in most rebate problems."

Unfortunately, this misses the key issue: Any process that artificially intereferes with the a negotiated price between a buyer and a seller is itself inherently fraudulent. Once the two agree on a price and terms for a transaction, that should be the end of the negotiation process. The rebate process interferes with that contract — it not only adds an inefficiency, it also adds to the transaction costs of the purchase. The mere prosecution of a rebate is a hidden cost to the transaction 

The entire bureaucratic, limited window, hyper-technical processing system itself is a massive fraud BY DEFINITION. From soup to nuts, it is created, designed, calibrated and exists for the sole purpose of denying rebates — all the while giving the appearance that it is merely a processing step.

To put it more dramatically, rebates are a Cancer on the retail sales process.

Why not actually sell the product for the negotiated price? Why create another level of transactional costs for consumers to obtain the negotiated price? 

The most ridiculous version of this comes from direct sellers — like Dell. What possible purpose can this idotic process be with a direct seller other than to generate a sales price higher than that agreed upon?

When I set up my  own firm, I had a pretty hefty PC order to make. My own experience with Dell was  to negotiate what I thought was a fair price on this order. At the end of the process, they told me a few hundred dollars ($200) of this involved a rebate was — I refused. I told them that "I don’t do rebates, thats a non-negotiable DEAL KILLER, and I’m going to HP. Tell Mikey Dell I said Buh-bye." 

This was after a long process of putting in a bid, tweaking the specs, adding more peripherals. But the Dell salesperson apparently had the ability to credit me the rebate money to the original purchase price — so I got the $200 credited to the purchase pre-sale (otherwise, there would not have been a sale).

I can only imagine the absurdity that somewhere in the labyrinth rebate process, Dell had to process a rebate — to themselves — if only for book keeping purposes. Silly.

The bottom line is simple: The negotiated price should be what you actually pay — without additional administrative headaches, and without further transaction costs. Anything that interferes with a Buyer and a Seller’s Price agreement is inherently problematic. If enough consumers boycotted products that have rebates, the manufacturers — and retailers — might get the clue.

>

Source:
A Growing Anger Over Unpaid Rebates
ALINA TUGEND
NYT, March 4, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/04/business/04shortcuts.html

Category: Financial Press, Retail

Real Estate Round Up

This past week saw a lot of Real Estate related data, all of which fits our long term thesis about the macro economy and what’s to come over the next few years.

For those of you who may be newer to the site, we have been dicussing this for quite a while: starting in December 2004, we noted how Real Estate was a prime driver of the economy, and in Spring 2005, how new hiring was overly reliant on the Real Estate Sector; in August 2005, we called that Housing was beginning to show signs of cooling, and that this would eventually wreak havoc on consumer spending. In the Fall 2005, we noted how dependent GDP had become on Mortgage Equity extraction. You can find all of these by using the site search function, right sidebar.

Now as  of March 2006, most of these concepts have become widely recognized and (mostly) accepted — but when they were first introduced here, there was no small amount of incredulity and pushback surrounding them.

Looking forward, I see rates rising, housing cooling further, the consumer cutting back, and the stimulus driven economy slowing, if not slipping into an outright recession.

On to the round up:

Existing Home Sales Slip 5th Consec Month

Home Foreclosure Surge

Home Prices Decellerate

Supply Up, New Homes Sales Down

New Homes Sales: 4th Drop in 6 months

• And the most ironic piece of all, The WSJ’s Greg Ip Discovers Data Manipulation

There’s more all over the web if you want to surf, but that’s the main gist of it.

>

UPDATE March 5, 2006 4:44pm

The NYT’s Sunday Magazine is all about Real Estate

Go to Introduction: The For-Sale Society

See the Sunday Times Mag TOC after the jump . . .

>

Read More

Category: Real Estate

Stock Market Dictionary Via the Devil’s Tongue

Category: Markets

Bear Stearns’ Trahan Gets Religon

Category: Markets

Why the Short Term Upside Bias?

Category: Investing, Technical Analysis, Trading

Fundamentally Speaking . . .

Category: Earnings, Economy, Federal Reserve, Inflation, Psychology, Real Estate

Tenner!

Category: Federal Reserve, Taxes and Policy

A Healthy Dose of Skepticism

Category: Apprenticed Investor, Data Analysis, Psychology

Non-energy Prices Lift Wholesale Prices

Category: Inflation

Media Appearance: Kudlow & Company (3/2/06)

Category: Media