Housing Bottom Calls Continue Despite Evidence

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 31st, 2012, 12:00PM

I have been very unequivocal about my view of Housing market — its not anywhere people should be expecting ordinary year over year price appreciation. As the recent  Case Shiller data shows, this is still a market where despite record low mortgage interest rates, prices are falling. A normalized market is probably many years away still.

So I find it encouraging when Robert Shiller states a similar view:

BLODGET: A lot of people have just called the bottom in the housing market in the United States, and there’s been some okay data recently. Is that your take? That finally housing prices are bottoming?

SHILLER: When people phrase is that way, they say ‘we’ve reached the bottom.’ That suggests that we have the expectation of a major turning point right now. But I don’t see that. I don’t see any reason to think that prices are going to start heading up dramatically now. We do have some good news. Permits are up. Notably, the National Association of Homebuilders Housing Market Index is up and that’s a forward looking index. But it’s not up very much. If you look at the rate of change it looks dramatic but it’s still at a low level.

- Siller: A Housing Bottom? What Are They Thinking?


As the charts below show, there is an enormous difference between a reversal and merely scraping along the bottom . . .

>

See also Video: Barry Ritholtz: A Housing Bottom Is Nowhere In Sight

>

Click to enlarge:

Source: Bianco Research

Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (November 2011)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 31st, 2012, 10:30AM

Through November 2011, the S&P/Case-Shiller1 Home Price Indices declined 1.3`% for both the 10- and 20-City Composites in November over October. For a second consecutive month, 19 of the 20 cities covered by the indices also saw home prices decrease.

For year over year data, the 10- and 20-City Composites posted losses of -3.6% and -3.7% versus November 2010. These are worse than the -3.2% and -3.4% respective rates reported for October.

Click to enlarge:

More charts after the jump

Read the rest of this entry »

10 Tuesday AM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 31st, 2012, 9:30AM

Some interesting reads to start your morning:

• Senate clears way for vote on insider-trading ban (Associated Press)
Hindsight Bias and Spurious Correlations: Why Wall Street is rooting for the Giants (Market Watch) (not cause they are the local home team?)
• Sarkozy’s German fixation (The Economist)
• Short China: Its commodities bubble is set to pop (Market Watch)
• Europe’s new fiscal pact raises hopes (FT.com) see also EU Nears Greek Confrontation Amid Fiscal Pact (Bloomberg)
My boi Chris Whalen gets the full Dealbook profile: New Fund Hopes to Prove Thesis of Outspoken Analyst (DealBook)
• Munis Cruise Through a Scorching January (Institutional Risk Analytics)
• Facebook’s Yahoo! Patent Problem (The Street)
• 5 reasons why Florida’s primary matters more than SC (Tampa Bay)
• Why the Clean Tech Boom Went Bust (Wired)

What are you reading?
>

Source: WSJ

2011 Investment Mea Culpas

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 31st, 2012, 7:30AM

January is nearly over, so it is once again time to look at the various errors, mistakes and bad calls that I made in the asset management business in 2011. I have made ‘fessing up part of my process – this is my third annual version (see my previous mea culpas for 2009 and 2010). I have made this an annual rite of contrition. Each January, I set down on paper my Mea Culpas – owning up to the errors, mistakes and failures that are a regular part of the investing process.

For most money managers, 2011 was a challenging year. But I am less concerned with under-performance as a Mea Culpa, choosing instead to focus on the process (for the record, we outperformed our benchmark, and did so with considerably less risk).

First the good news: Assessing what did right in 2011, there were plenty of things to be pleased with: The Macro calls worked well, we stuck to our discipline. We avoided the entire August collapse. Buying into the breakout in October, we quickly reversed ourselves when it failed. And when the signs were to go long and strong to start the year, I held my nose and did so.

As always, in the business of managing assets, there is always something new to learn. This morning, I want to look not at what I got right, but rather what I did wrong, where there is room for improvement. We will also revisit prior mea culpas to see where we have been fortunate to improve as a result of these annual lists.

Let’s have at it:

1. Running Assets vs. Managing a Business: It may be obvious, but these are two very different skill sets. I first mentioned this last year – and though these are supposed to be mea culpas, I have to give kudos to a pair of outstanding hires: Josh and Anna. They make me better, and for that I am grateful.

Possible solution: Learning to be a business manager versus an asset manager means reaching outside your comfort zone, educating yourself, pushing into new areas. But the key: Find more outstanding people and hire them.

2. Confirmation Bias: I find myself reading more of the analysts whose current views I agree with and less of those whose views are opposite my own. Off the top of my head: Laksman Athushan, Jim Bianco, Michael Belkin and John Hussman. I need to find people whose macro views differ from mine as well as those whose market perspective is more aggressive than my own.

Possible solution: Read more of the folks I occasionally disagree with like Doug Kass, David Rosenberg, and others. Worry less about hunting for that nugget of info and more on the process others employ to challenge my own views.

3. Articulate policy and principles: I have a pretty firm set of beliefs when it comes to investing (seen in about 6,000 posts on the blog), but I have yet to put it down in a short format. This is a function of laziness and fear of ridicule.

Possible solution: DO IT. Break the beliefs down into 10 key principles, post them somewhere, and review annually. Forget about the opinions of the public and focus on what matters most to yourself and your process.

4. Skepticism: I tend to disbelieve/distrust/ignore new sources of info. I have begun to grow cynical. This has led to unfairly dismissing new sources  of information/analysis/commentary. The secret to being skeptical — and to Sturgeons Law — is to not reject 100% of everything that comes your way, just the 95% that is crap.

Possible solution: Consider the what ifs before rejecting something. Might this analyst be correct? Might their process work out? Be more generous with your attitude rather than being so dismissive.

5. Communication: A new issue for me, as I added lots more individual clients. I was very inefficient when I came to communicating with both new and prospective clients. Its not that I didn’t communicate; rather, it was haphazard and disorganized. Too many phone calls, too many calendar conflicts.

Possible solution: Organize: Create a system of communication to both existing and prospective clients. Use technology, conference calls, webinars to reach people in a more efficient way.

6. Time Management: An annual issue, although I did get better at it this year (see #1 above). Focus more on research, writing, and asset management –let the rest come to you.

Possible solution: Prioritize: Do less of what matters least; Work with a daily checklist to make sure things get finished; Focus.

7. Clients: It is always a balancing act when dealing with clients. On the one hand, you cannot blow them off when they bring you concerns (its their money!). On the other hand, you cannot allow the investing public’s group mentality (or panic) to infect you. Further, we took some heat for calls that turned out to be correct, but in a few cases, took steps at the request of clients that lowered overall performance; that must stop.

Possible solution: Be proactive. Improve regular communication with all clients; Work on making sure they understand the process, our current thoughts, and where we are so as to avoid the 2nd guessing. Preempt the “My way or the highway” conversation proactively;

8. Undercapitalized: I worked on several projects where capital was a major issue. This is something that is singularly important to any new entity. The bootstrapping approach seems to work in very rare circumstances where there is an immediate influx of revenue, but for moist start ups, it’s a pipedream. You cannot grow a business when the daily focus is raising money.

Possible solution: Steer away from firms that have too little capital. Make sure that the structure is appropriate. Avoid the classic undercapitalized but over enthusiastic founders.

~~~

Follow up from prior year’s Mea Culpas

1. Too Many Equity Mutual Funds: I have always known mutual funds were a mixed bag, and last year, I finally did something about it: In my asset allocation model, I slowly replaced mutual funds with ETFs. A portfolio I took over began with 8 funds and 2 ETFs; that raio is now reversed.

Actual solution: Used more ETFs more to increase exposure quickly so we carry less cash sooner and raise exposure more quickly; Better to own positions with tight stops, or to own half positions, than none at all;

2. Putting Cash to work: Despite making the right call in early March, we legged in slowly. I am not suggesting that you go all in on a single day or week, but the process of going from 80% cash to fully invested took longer than it should have. Directly related to the two points above, when the market is rallying aggressively, we need to carry less cash sooner and more exposure more quickly;

Actual solution: iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Fund – rather than sit with a 40% cash position – even for a month – the 1-3 year yields something, and if we are right on why we moved to cash, may even appreciate.

3. Focus!: We all have many items calling out for our attention; but having too much on your plate means things fall through the cracks (like that option trade!). Our modern short attention span society has the appearance of being more productive, but probably isn’t. Free association is great for creative brainstorming sessions, but winging it during execution means stuff is going to slide.

Actual solution: The checklist! When I stick to my TTD, I can be wonderfully productive. Must stay with that in 2010.

4. Health: After years of neglect, I promised myself that when I turned 50, I would start taking better care of myself. Your body is a used car, and if you want to get to 150,000 miles, you need to do more than put in petrol. (I was embarrassed to put this down as a mea culpa last year).

Actual solution: Went for my first check up in years. (Blood Pressure/Cholesterol are excellent)  On a diet, going to the gym, running again. Colonoscopy scheduled for the Spring. Now the trick is to trick to it.

~~~

As always, ideas, suggestions, and hints for improving are always welcome!

Anecdotes Wanted . . .

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 30th, 2012, 8:40PM

“The reason capitalism has triumphed in the West and sputtered in the rest of the world is because most of the assets in Western nations have been integrated into one formal representational system . . . By transforming people with real property interests into accountable individuals, formal property created individuals from masses. People no longer needed to rely on neighborhood relationships or make local arrangements to protect their rights to assets. They were thus freed to explore how to generate surplus value from their own assets.”-Hernando de Soto, The Mystery of Capital

>

In The Mystery of Capital, de Soto raised a fascinating thesis: That the West’s system of record keeping and property recording  is why Capitalism took hold here.

In other regions — namely, Asia, Africa and much of South America, the Peruvian born economist argued that the economic system was highly dependent on elders, neighbors, and recollections — rather than recorded deeds — for transferring property. This would, as you might imagine, stifle the willingness to invest in or lend against property.

Tonight, I want to ask you for actual anecdotes about this. What sort of stories or narratives is anyone familiar with that demonstrate the East’s problems with this, and why it may have stifled the spread of capitalism.

This is for a wicked cool project that I cannot talk about yet . . .

10 Monday PM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 30th, 2012, 4:30PM

My afternoon train reading:

• What is the value-added of managers  – and the all too common mistake of confusing charisma with management skills: Football’s best managers (FT.com) see also Weaning Off ‘Alternative’ Investments (WSJ)
• The Baltic Dry Meltdown Continues (WSJ)
• Are Companies More Powerful Than Countries? (Time)
• U.S. Stocks in Longest Valuation Slump Since Nixon (Bloomberg)
• ROBERT SHILLER: A Housing Bottom? What Are They Thinking? (Business Insider)
• The Yin and the Yang of Corporate Innovation (NYT)
• Wealth can be a political burden (Washington Postsee also How Romney’s Tax Rate Stacks Up To Recent Presidential Candidates’ (TPM)
NYT Goes Deeper on Chinese Apple Factory Working Conditions: Human Costs Are Built Into an iPad (NYT)
• Fighting Bullshit (MOJO: Parts 1 and Part 2)
Hilarious Tumblr blog: Newt Gingrich Judges You (Newt Gingrich Judges You)

What are you reading?

2009 low vs 1974

How Bullish is the Golden Cross ? (UPDATED)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 30th, 2012, 12:00PM

Pinging around trading desks last week was a report from Birinyi Research on the Golden Cross. Given where prices are (and the days dropping off the MA from 200 days ago) the S&P Composite is likely to see the Golden Cross soon

Here’s the excerpt:

“There were 26 instances in the past 50 years when the S&P 500’s short-term average crossed above the long-term gauge, according to Birinyi. The index rose 81 percent of the time with an average increase of 6.6 percent in the next six months, the data show.

Stocks posted bigger returns when the S&P 500’s 50-day rose above a falling 200-day, Birinyi data show. The index jumped an average 10 percent over the next six months, according to the study.”

There were two unfortunate problems errors in that piece: First, there were two mistakes for two specific years (1/26/72 and 9/15/94). That is based on Ron Griess’ work, using data from The Chart Store.

Second, they used an odd time period — 1960 to present. Data exists back to 1930s, so why not use it? The usual answer is data mining, and as we see below, that very much applies here. The post 1960 data is far more bullish than the earlier data — so why use it?

Overall, the Golden Cross does have a positive bias — its just not nearly as Bullish as that Birinyi report suggests. (File that in the blue recycle bin)

The following two tables and 17 charts (from The Chart Store) show the history of such events for the S&P Composite from 1930 to the present, including ALL 47 crosses where the 50 day moving average is rising and moves above the 200 day moving average. Not how the data after 1960 is much more bullish.

(I am surprised this came from Birinyi Research — I have never known them to data mine previously)

>

Click to enlarge:
Based on 50 day crossing a falling 200 day Moving Average


>

Based on 50 day crossing a rising 200 day Moving Average


All tables courtesy of The Chart Store

All >

Chart examples of nearly all of these are after the jump

Previously:
Worry About Important Things — Not The Death Cross (August 16th, 2011)

See also:
All Star Charts: Pay No Attention To This Golden Cross (January 30, 2012)

Read the rest of this entry »

Is the Rally in Treasury Bonds Over?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 30th, 2012, 11:00AM

One of my favorite sections of Barron’s each week is the Review/Preview — including a weekly question where they ask “They Said What?” Its a weekly must read.

This week, they asked the loaded Is the Rally in Treasury Bonds Over?

Here are the answers:

David Goldman
Principal, Macrostrategy.com
“There has been a near-perfect inverse correlation between commodities and term yields, and that shows that the Treasury market is starting to worry about inflation, as well it should. The big commodity-price recovery is bad for bonds. Asian demand will lift commodity prices, so bonds will underperform.”

~~~

Jim O’Sullivan
Economist, MarketWatch forecaster of the year, 2011
“It’s hard to get too bearish on bond yields near term, but chances are yields will be up more than down in coming months, if the economy grows modestly.”

~~~

David Rosenberg
Chief economist and strategist, Gluskin Sheff
“No. By the time it’s over, the yield curve will have mean-reverted to 200 basis points from today’s 275 basis-point gap. Since the Fed will keep short rates at zero through 2014, the inevitable flattening of the curve will occur via much lower long-term yields.”

~~~

Jason Hsu
Chief Investment Officer, Research Affiliates
“It’s anyone’s guess whether Treasuries will move up or down in the next six to 12 months. But the secular yield decline has probably reached its bottom.”

Fascinating stuff.

>

Source:
They Said What? U.S. Bonds
CHRISTOPHER C. WILLIAMS  
Barron’s January 28, 2012
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052748704895604577178961898660908.html

10 Monday AM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 30th, 2012, 9:30AM

My reads to start the week off:

• Freddie Mac Bets Against American Homeowners (ProPublica)
• Money From MF Global Feared Gone (WSJ)
• 9.8 Million Shadow Inventory Says Housing Market is a Long Way From the Bottom (Naked Capitalism)
• Flurry of Subpoenas Raises Force-Placed Stakes (American Banker) see also Wall Street Wants Rebound, Needs Shakeup (Bloomberg)
• Funding the Academic War on Financial Reform (New Deal 2.0)
• U.S. Debt Gets Recalibrated (WSJ) see also Persistently Low Rates Carry Risk of Negative Side Effect (WSJ)
• Revisiting A Gold Bet (Research Puzzle)
• Greek Debt Talks Resume in Athens as Policy Makers Squabble Over Haircut (Bloomberg) see also Should emerging market equities trade at a premium? (Reuters)
• Comparing Obama and Reagan’s economic records (Washington Post) see also Obama Recovery is No ’Morning in America’ Yet (Bloomberg)
• Apple Fuels Hiring Amid Bubble 2.0 Concern (Bloomberg)

What are you reading?

>

U.S. Banks Tally Their Exposure to Europe’s Debt Maelstrom

Source: DealBook

GDP Post Mortem: Less Than Meets the Eye

Email this post Print this post
By Invictus - January 30th, 2012, 7:00AM

Friday’s release of GDP prompted me to get back to the keyboard. I confess that between my day job and musing about economic issues for TBP and @TBPinvictus, I have been time challenged. I’ve been leaning toward the one that pays the bills.

Back to Friday’s GDP data: 2.8% was weaker than expectations, and the guts were weaker still. Dean Baker does a very nice job explaining the weakness here.

A few simple charts show the magnitude of the hole we’re still struggling to dig out of. All three involve Real GDP and Potential GDP; we’re just getting three distinct views.

At this point, Real GDP and Real Potential GDP are running roughly parallel to each other — we’ll obviously never close the gap with that being the case:>


>

We still have a “hole” of almost $1 trillion dollars of slack in our economy:


>

That $1 trillion of slack represents a deficit of about 7% off our potential.


>

A few noteworthy comments on GDP:

Via Catherine Rampell’s Twitter stream I learned that “2011 overall was the slowest non-recessionary year of GDP growth since 1947, says Neal Soss of Credit-Suisse.”

And from Stephanie Pomboy, via Alan Abelson in Barron’s, we learned that:

“Fully 1.94 percentage points of the 2.8% GDP number came from an inventory build (just the kind of hefty involuntary rise, we might add, that often is followed by a contraction as companies trim their excessive stocks of goods). That means, Stephanie says, that real final sales were up a feeble 0.8%. And that figure benefited significantly from a big jump in auto purchases that all by itself chipped in 0.3 percentage point to GDP.”

To quantify Mr. Abelson’s parenthetical comment:  Historically speaking, there appears to be about a 68 percent probability we’ll see an inventory contraction for the first quarter.  In the past 52 years — 208 quarters — inventories contributed more than 1.75% 40 times (a 1-in-5 occurrence).  Of those 40 times, the following quarter showed contraction in inventories 27 times.

Among our ongoing trouble spots, of course, is the housing market, which at this point seems to be bouncing along what we all hope will be the bottom.  One category measuring activity in that sector is Private Residential Fixed Investment (PRFI), which peaked in early 2006 at $813 billion (SAAR).  It is now about 42% of that level — at $346 billion (SAAR), and has been running at roughly 60 percent of the level it was at when we slipped into recession (i.e. the economic peak) in the fourth quarter of 2007.  Below is a chart demonstrating exactly how weak housing is relative to other recessions:

Read the rest of this entry »

49 queries. 2.366 seconds.